Hmmm. Many, if not all waterfalls are *not* vertical in the strict sense of the word.
On 25 September 2013 14:47, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com>wrote: > > 2013/9/25 Janko Mihelić <jan...@gmail.com> > >> Maybe waterway=waterfall could be a node on the way (or a a way, if >> waterfalls are long), and natural=waterfall could be an area showing where >> they are. >> > > > maybe that's not a bad idea, waterway=waterfall could be a place where the > water is falling down (vertical), while natural=waterfall would be an > entity for the whole area, which represents "the waterfall" (a grouping of > where in reality you will often have several points of water falling inside > the same "waterfall") and gets the name, the wikipedia link and so on, and > which groups all single details about where the water falls. > > cheers, > Martin > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
