Wouldn't the more generic disused=yes apply to this case? Rendering apps should support lifecycle tags and render them accordingly (though often then don't and none would support this anyway).
I'd keep the route relation while the route is still open and somewhat popular among hikers. On Oct 1, 2013 2:57 PM, "Martin Koppenhoefer" <[email protected]> wrote: > > 2013/10/1 SomeoneElse <[email protected]> > >> If something does exist, you might want to draw other mappers to its >> "abandoned" status somehow. Here's a route near me that's still partially >> signed but not supported by the council (the organisation that created it) >> on safety grounds >> > > > that's why I suggested the abandoned-prefixing (on talk-it) because he > pointed out that many hiking guides will still have records for this route > and my guess is that you'll also find one or the other trailblaze for a > certain period of time, so it seemed like a compromise. > > > >> >> Not that it particularly matters one way or the other. >> > > > +1 > > cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
