Hi Bryce, Did you mean you find the proposal a bit difficult to understand ? Yes it is. Nevertheless, many of tagging is optional, I can edit the document to show it in a more understandable way.
This proposal doesn't prevent mappers to map large overhead transmission lines as landmark if they want to. It describe a consistent tagging scheme to allow mappers who want to get deeper in description. Cheers. *François Lacombe* francois dot lacombe At telecom-bretagne dot eu http://www.infos-reseaux.com 2013/10/9 Bryce Nesbitt <bry...@obviously.com> > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 1:46 PM, François Lacombe < > francois.laco...@telecom-bretagne.eu> wrote: > >> You can send me any formal and constructive suggestion about that. >> Vote will begin shortly. Stay tuned. >> > > I've found the power proposal a bit much to follow... > ... but have found it satisfying to map the simpler case of which street > corridors have overhead vs. undergrounded wires ("utilities=underground"). > I hope the eventual power proposal continues to have a place for those of > us who map larger transmission lines > as landmarks, even if the electrical characteristics are unknown or > unimportant to us. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
