> > > For the average mapper, I think the best solution is to have a picture of > most surfaces and their corresponding smoothnesses. So a picture of > excellent asphalt, a picture of good asphalt,... a picture of intermediate > ground,... and a picture of horrible sand. And everything in between. > Actually you don't need all combinations because some of them don't make > sense. Those pictures would then show up in all editors when you search for > the surface you need. >
It would be a pity if instead of using surface=sand the mapper would use tracktype=grade4. If I know that I was facing a drive on sand I could deflate the tires of my car slightly to provide better traction, which is a standard procedure in this cases. How would I know with tracktype=grade4?
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
