2014-02-05 17:14 GMT+01:00 Pee Wee <[email protected]>: > I'd discourage this tagging (and, semantically it doesn't make sense >> anyway). >> >> OK but why does it not make sense semantically? It seems to me that it is > unambigious
it has no meaning at all. A point / node has no direction, so forward/backward do not make any sense, only ways can have forward/backward. What you want to do is an implicit relation (you want to say: this node "a" in forward direction of this way "b" has this restriction "c") without creating it explicitly. As it is implicit, common tools won't know about it (they only know explicit relations). One could implement a method to determine such situations for the tools, but that still doesn't make the semantics nice looking, you still have a tag on a node which is actually about the direction of a way without the way being explicitly stated. A better mapping would somehow reference this way (and the node, i.e. a relation). cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
