There is an interesting question on this tag's talk page: > I think it collide with "building=industrial", "building=factory" and > "landuse=industrial" and i propose to "delete" this Tag. > Or why should we use this Tag? > cptechnik - Peter Coenen - > Windeck<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Cptechnik>( > talk<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cptechnik&action=edit&redlink=1>) > 22:06, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
2014-02-25 13:36 GMT-03:00 Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]>: > > > > Am 25/feb/2014 um 17:27 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer < > [email protected]>: > > > > > > > >> Am 25/feb/2014 um 17:10 schrieb Pieren <[email protected]>: > >> > >> Why not. But what about this sentence : "landuse=industrial to show > >> the area around the building. " ? > > > > > > IMHO the building should be included. There's no problem in tagging all > areas that are industrially used with landuse=industrial, so my suggestion > is to add landuse=industrial to works if it's missing. > > > Another possible question is whether to add landuse=commercial to offices > inside the plant, which I'd reply with not in general, maybe yes if it is a > big and or fenced area of only offices that happens to be enclosed by the > plant. If a producing /manufacturing company has an administrative site > outside of producing facilities this would not be industrial of course. > > cheers, > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
