I have a few objections about that proposal: landuse=winter_sports I don't like this way of confining a ski resort. First, landuse=winter_sports here is used to tag a ski resort. That can't be right, because a restaurant can be a part of a ski resort, and it isn't used for winter sports. Second, the areas are going to be arbitrary because ski resorts don't have explicit borders as far as I know.
aerialway=mixed_lift This value is a bit vague. How are you going to tag aerialway:occupancy of both types of lifts? What if there is a mixed lift with chairs that have 4 seats and chairs that have 2 seats? I have a feeling only relations can tag this right, but maybe there is a better solution. Other than those, the proposal looks ok to me. Janko 2014-02-25 20:58 GMT+01:00 yvecai <[email protected]>: > Is there any objection to move this page out of the Proposed features? > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Piste_Maps > > This is widely used, and the page is stable for long now. From time to > time some opensnowmap.org users feels like they shouldn't use it because > of its 'proposal' look on the wiki. > Also, maybe a few changes could be proposed, but it would be easier to > first settle this wiki page in the 'accepted' ones. > > If there is no objection, and someone knows how to do, please do. > Yves > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
