|
On 2014-02-25 15:24, Peter Wendorff
wrote :
Oh no, please please please, let us not start that same thread all over again.Hi André, as far as I know, the same would be possible with opening_hours="24/7, Fr 14:00-22:00 off" (opening-hours: how to code "always but..."?) What you say has already been said, amended, denied, rejected in every way etc. It's a tagging that I originally proposed and the comments were ("inside quotes") -1 24/7 : "it's wrong", "is used for a rendering icon" -1 ,; : , -1 off : "is not used", "is used, but not like that" On 2014-02-25 15:33, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote : +1-1 opening_hours="open; Fr 14:00-22:00 off"-1 : open : "it's an invention" So ... your contradictory replies are the exact proof that closing-hours is badly needed. Failing that, the chaos that you demonstrate will continue. And that means a useless database. Only closing-hours=Fr 14:00-22:00 cannot be disputed. Cheers,
no need for an extra tag. Also keep in mind that two tags opening_hours and closing_hours are error prone when used both together at the same object.regards Peter Am 25.02.2014 14:50, schrieb André Pirard:Hi, I had to tag several parking lots closed on times such as *Fr 14:00-22:00* when the market took place there. I raised a convoluted discussion: everyone had a different opinion about that tagging, plus strange comments (*). After more than 10 hours spent in research and collaboration, I had to conclude with the inability of the Key:Opening_hours <http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Opening_hours> specification to express that timing, or explain it, at least simply. I finally used a vary straightforward and clear: *closing-hours=Fr 14:00-22:00* and I suggest that you use it too and that you add that key to the specification. It can be clearly explained, once won't hurt, as follows: As often funnily put, /*closing-hours*/ is the same as /*opening-hours*/ except that it is exactly the opposite :-) Seriously: use /*closing-hours*/ with the same rules as *opening-hours* and invert the result: opening time becomes closing time and conversely. It couldn't be more simple, obvious and understandable. Quite the opposite of that story. May this be helpful, Cheers, André. (*) I read very strange statements such as: "off" must not be defined, it must be grasped. "off" is not used. "off" is used, but not like that. xxx, must not be defined because it has been used for a long time. it's wrong. it's wrong. ... (without saying what's right) etc, etc, etc... In face of such chaos, I tried to help by putting the rules in a clear diagram so that the incongruities would stand out and be corrected, and the reactions were twofold: - yeah, finally a simple and understandable explanation - it's wrong, but again without saying more, less making corrections |
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
