If I understand right you should probably ask imports@ not tagging@ about making bulk edits, even if they're to fix bulk edits!
Best Dan 2014-05-28 21:53 GMT+01:00 malenki <o...@malenki.ch>: > Recently I found some 10.000 (one of two changesets contained 38k) > objects tagged like this:¹ > | gnis:fcode=39004 > | natural=water > | nhd:com_id=146082168 > | nhd:fdate=Mon Mar 06 00:00:00 PST 2006 > | nhd:reach_code=18030012024071 > | source=NHD > | water=lake;pond > > They were imported by nmixter and in v1 were tagged like this: > | ele=0.0 > | gnis:fcode=39004 > | gnis:ftype=LakePond > | natural=water > | nhd:com_id=146082168 > | nhd:fdate=Mon Mar 06 00:00:00 PST 2006 > | nhd:reach_code=18030012024071 > | source=NHD > > "WorstFixer" removed ele 0.0 and honoured his name by converting > gnis:ftype=LakePond to > water=lake;pond > > Has anyone objections for removing water=lake;pond and also the other > proprietary data? > I'd think > | natural=water > and > | source=NHD > (and in case it is there) > intermittent=yes > should be sufficient > > See also: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2237 > > Regards > Thomas > > ¹ example: https://www.osm.org/way/73966050/history > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
