Maxspeed is not the only issue. See my previous message:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2014-June/017860.html

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Paul Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Osmand and pretty much any other nav software worth it's salt already
> interprets maxspeed (though I wish minspeed was also factored in more
> often).
>
> On Jun 17, 2014 4:25 AM, "Philip Barnes" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I disagree with just using a number, the tags are there to indicate that
>> the mapper had interpreted the speed limit from the type of road.
>>
>> Should the limits change they make finding the limits that require changes
>> easier.
>>
>> The number should be tagged, and I would not expect a data consumer to use
>> maxspeed tags, they are useful for validation.
>>
>>
>> Phil (trigpoint)
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my Nokia N9
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 17/06/2014 10:09 Andrew Shadura wrote:
>>
>> Both "maxspeed=<countrycode>:<zone type>" and "maxspeed=<zone type>" are
>> evil, as we need to have a separate DB for those zonal limits. Please, just
>> use maxspeed=<number>.
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>>   Andrew
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>



-- 
Fernando Trebien
+55 (51) 9962-5409

"Nullius in verba."

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to