I think the problem with Openseamap is that they have two layers of tiles, one standard layer which they take from openstreetmap servers:
http://b.tile.openstreetmap.org/15/17484/10492.png and one over it, with all the symbols: http://tiles.openseamap.org/seamark/15/17484/10492.png 2014-07-09 22:15 GMT+02:00 Daniel Koć <[email protected]>: > W dniu 09.07.2014 22:03, John Packer napisał(a): > > > MapQuest matches the prerequisites to be a feature tile on OSM >> homepage [1]. >> > > OpenSeaMap matches them even better, so it's still not clear to me why MQ > was selected and OSeaM was not. > > A similar discussion recently started on the _talk_ mailing list [2]. >> > > Andy has just wrote that. > > OK, I stop off topic discussion and move with it to the right place. > > Thanks! > > > -- > Mambałaga > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
