PS: If you removed these 'bridges as area', you probably should fix that.
2014-08-12 9:02 GMT-03:00 John Packer <[email protected]>: > Richard, > Perhaps these cases in which the outline of the bridge was drawn is > related to this proposal: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/man_made%3Dbridge > > I believe it's main purpose is to solve a known rendering problem in > bridges. > Nowadays, when two or more parallel ways are in a bridge/viaduct, they are > drawn as separate bridges. > Drawing the area of the bridge would solve that. > > Cheers, > John > > > 2014-08-12 6:26 GMT-03:00 Richard Z. <[email protected]>: > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:23:35AM -0400, Christopher Hoess wrote: >> > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 7:57 PM, SomeoneElse < >> [email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > For the benefit of anyone looking at taginfo stats in this thread, >> it's >> > > worth mentioning that there's some "non-survey-based" editing going >> on: >> > > >> > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/24690099 >> > > >> > > >> > All "bridge=drawbridge" to "bridge=movable bridge:movable=drawbridge". >> The >> > bigger problem is that many of these bridges, whether originally tagged >> by >> > local surveyors or not, are probably strictly speaking bascule bridges, >> > "drawbridge" being used casually for any sort of movable bridge. >> >> it was a test to see what can go wrong during such conversion. There were >> quite some odd cases, like bridge=drawbridge used to "draw" the outline of >> the bridge. >> >> Some time in the future I would like to review all bridge=swing and fix >> at least those which are not movable at all but hanging rope bridges >> instead. >> >> Richard >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
