On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 12:31:28PM +0200, Martin Vonwald wrote: > 2014-08-14 12:25 GMT+02:00 André Pirard <[email protected]>: > > > On 2014-08-14 11:08, Janko Mihelić wrote : > > > > Well first, tunnel=yes is obviously wrong. We need to replace this with > > cave=yes. Other than that, I have no problems with this. If a cave has two > > cave entrances, then information that they are connected by footpaths is > > valuable information. > > > > Obviously? Regarding paths and waterways, especially ones fitted up for > > tourism, I wonder... > > > > Maybe not completely obvious, but I would agree with Janko. In my opinion, > a "tunnel" is man-made, while a "cave" is not.
whether or not man-made is not the biggest problem. The big problem with tunnel=yes or tunnel=cave is that they only would ever get rendered if they were also tagged as a highway or similar. This is a big disadvantage because most caves don't have even paths. Richard _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
