Am 15.09.2014 14:20, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > > 2014-09-15 13:26 GMT+02:00 Dave F. <dave...@madasafish.com > <mailto:dave...@madasafish.com>>: > > A user has changed some tags of a way:
No need for a change as it is possible to simply add your new tags > 1. oneway=yes to access:backward=no > > 2. psv=opposite_lane to psv:backward=yes > > What are the differences between the tags? The originals are the > more commonly used. I'm unsure how it adds any detail or clarity to > the database. You thoughts please. > > > > > Not sure about the best psv way of tagging, but the oneway case seems > clear to me. > oneway=yes is a very well established widely used and easy to understand > tag and should not be changed (i.e. removed/substituted) to something > less used, longer and more complicated (hyphen) like access:backward=no > This change might also introduce problems in certain jurisdictions (e.g. > if bicycle-access is generally granted in oneway streets and > counterdirection for streets with the oneway-sign, which is most likely > not defined for access:backward. Furthermore I'd expect the oneway=yes > not to apply to pedestrians while access:backward=no would IMHO apply to > pedestrians. +1 both might be introduced with the "lanes:" tagging system. At least 2. makes sense. If it is only one lane in opposite direction you usually do not need an additional ":lanes" in the keys. 1. should be oneway=yes and oneway:psv=no 2. both tags are ok but deleting is not needed. cu fly _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging