Incidentally, this is a similar clock tower in Chile: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1905022230
(it's not rendered on Mapnik) On 16 September 2014 23:11, Tom Pfeifer <[email protected]> wrote: > Andy Mabbett wrote on 2014-09-16 22:10: > >> How should this clock: >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chamberlain_Clock >> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/187104810 >> >> be tagged? It's a notable landmark, but not a memorial. >> >> > It is already amenity=clock and has a name. > You might add tourism=attraction and start_date=1903 . > > I'm not overly convinced by the 'historic=tower', though it fulfils the > height definition in the wiki. Thus, if tower, it should be man_made=tower, > in this case historic could be reduced to =yes, or historic=clock as this > is the main purpose. > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
