Oh, sorry, Pieren was faster… ;-) Lukas Sommer
2014-09-30 12:34 GMT+00:00 Lukas Sommer <sommer...@gmail.com>: > > If there is a need to tag traffic signal names and junction names on the > same node, then the logical solution is junction:name=* and > traffic_signals:name=*. Or in different languages: junction:name:th=* and > traffic_signals:name:kr=*. > > Different names for junction and traffic signal are probably not a > real-world case. > > Lukas Sommer > > 2014-09-30 12:21 GMT+00:00 Janko Mihelić <jan...@gmail.com>: > >> 2014-09-29 23:45 GMT+02:00 Lukas Sommer <sommer...@gmail.com>: >> >>> The case of Japan is different. In Japan, the name belongs to the >>> _traffic signal_, and _not_ to the junction. We need to distinguish this, >>> because they are usually differently rendered (traffic signal names usually >>> with an icon and junction names usually without an icon). >>> >>> But what would we gain when we distinguish between th:junction_area and >>> kr:junction_area - because here we have two values for the same feature. >>> >> >> If there is a need to tag traffic signal names and junction names on the >> same node, then the logical solution is junction:name=* and >> traffic_signals:name=*. Or in different languages: junction:name:th=* and >> traffic_signals:name:kr=*. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging