2014-11-05 12:23 GMT+01:00 Richard Z. <[email protected]>: > after two years in the wiki where it was marked as approved and active it > would not appear as a great idea to declare the vote for invalid based on > nitpicking formalities, how many votes were missing for approval? >
it was 50% missing (5 people) Another reason I don't like current arete/ridge state is that some ridges > are > very long - and they may be partially arete and ridge in different > segments. > you can split them ;-) Having a way that is tagged partially as natural=ridge and partially as > natural=arete seems like a bad idea. it won't be a "way", it will be several ways. cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
