What about more complex buildings with multiple roofs? 2014-11-12 12:27 GMT+01:00 johnw <[email protected]>:
> > > level=roof sounds fine to me. Roof always gets special treatment (it’s > usually never a floor number) > > > > On Nov 12, 2014, at 6:34 PM, Pieren <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:22 PM, johnw <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 2014-11-11 12:53 GMT+01:00 Tobias Knerr <[email protected]>: > > > >>> Therefore, would prefer a generic tag that can be added to any feature, > >>> e.g. location=rooftop. > > > > -1 > > 'location' is already a bad keyword in OSM. Like "type", it is too > > generic and could be used for every thing. > > > >> On Nov 11, 2014, at 9:36 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer < > [email protected]> > >> Those are excellent ideas. Then you could use location=rooftop (or > similar) > >> to place basically anything on the roof, including multistory or surface > >> parking structures. Garden roofs come to mind. > > > > I think the roof is part of the building 3d or levels mapping. We > > should not create a new use of "location" just for that. I could also > > imagine that in some buildings, the parking is somewhere in the middle > > and not necessarily on the top or on the bottom of the building, in > > which case you will have to invent a new tag for that. > > I would prefer something like "level=roof" or "level=3". Just where > > the parking(s) is in the building. > > > > Pieren > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Tagging mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
