+1 I agree with alt_name=name1;name2
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Lukas Sommer <[email protected]> wrote: > Some time ago, there was a discussion on the “talk” mailing list about how > to deal with the situation of more than one alt_name: > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-September/070838.html > > Most participants preferred the solution “alt_name=name1;name2” over > solutions like “alt_name_1=name1”+“alt_name_2=name2”. > > However, the discussion didn’t lead to something “official”. > > I think it could be useful to have a clear documentation on the wiki about > which solution is the preferred one. > > Would a feature proposal be a good way to get there? > > Lukas Sommer > > PS: Me to, I would prefer “alt_name=name1;name2” over other solutions. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
