Am 13.12.2014 16:23, schrieb Volker Schmidt:
Compliments for the map. In fact I knew it already.
That is the type of map that would profit from additional tagging for
watermills, like number of wheels.
Fell free to invent taggings. If there should be enough use by the
mappers we might add different symbols. However I have the feeling that
it should be sufficient to map one symbol for watermills and show the
details in the "details" popup tab.
As for citywalls:
We interprete the term historic=* as "being of historic relevance" in
contrast to "former". Sometimes it cannot be separated clearly and we
are aware of the different types of usage of "historic" in the OSM
community. We have to live with it. So we see no problem in having an
existic roman bridge tagged as historic. In fact we recommend to do so.
I remember the discussion came up for citywalls recently whether we
should render them even if they aren't tagged as historic. Have to check
on that.
Cheers
Zecke
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
