Martin Vonwald (Imagic) wrote: > Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > No, no, no. > In my opinion, there are a few "no"s missing here. So I'll add at least > one more: no. Well, make that two: No.
...there's no limit... Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Feature-Proposal-RFC-Obligatory-vs-optional-cycletracks-tp5827960p5827995.html Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
