cycleway=opposite is useful for marking that cyclists may drive in both direction, \ but there is no marked contraflow lane (for streets with contraflow lane there is cycleway=opposite_lane tag).
2014-12-25 20:36 GMT+01:00 Marc Gemis <[email protected]>: > I never understood the cycleway=opposite. I would really need a picture of > a situation where you need it. > > IMHO you do not have to use this tag on a oneway street where cyclists can > drive in both directions, but on their own side. So I think your > requirement to always add it to a oneway street that allows cyclists in > both directions is wrong. > > regards > > m > > > > On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Ulrich Lamm <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Dear mapping and cycling friends >> >> as that article is in German, it is questionable, if the international >> mailig list is a good adress, >> but in German language, I've found only local mailing lists. >> >> As one can hear and read in discussions, and as is visible from the >> results of mapping, a lot of mappers know very little about the cycling >> facilities, they map. >> >> And the WIki in all, the German Wiki in special, is a bit labyrinthical. >> Several guidelines are not complete, some describe only one of the serious >> schemes or even suggest(ed) a scheme that can't be called serious. >> >> I've tried to accomplish and harmonize articles, but some people don't >> like that and reverted them. >> >> Now, as subpages of my user page, there are two more exact versions of >> "DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen kartieren": >> >> >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Ulamm/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen >> kartieren/revision from 23 December 2014 >> is an attempt of a comprehensive explanation of real cycling facilities >> and a comprehensive presentation of the tagging possibilities. On 25 >> Dezember I've done some lesser revisions. >> >> >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Ulamm/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen >> kartieren/approach from 24 December 2014 >> explains the reality of cycling facilities, but on the guidelines only >> the biggest mistakes are corrected and only the biggest nonsens is deleted. >> >> Who refuses to a comprehensive presentation of reality and serious >> tagging schemes, has to accept the reproach to submit to ways of tagging >> that inhibit optimal routing and correct rendering. >> >> Merry Xmas, >> Ulrich >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
