Could you please consider either subscribing to the nondigested version of the mailing list <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging> or use procmail to split each digest into it's constituent messages <http://pm-doc.sourceforge.net/doc/#splitting_digest>? Replying to the emails containing the digested mbox breaks threading by not preserving the In-Reply-To or Subject headers and makes everyone else's mailboxes harder to manage (particularly for folks filtering by thread; most folks are likely to filter anything with "digest" in the subject straight to trash or mute it without reading).
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 7:03 AM, Ulrich Lamm <[email protected]> wrote: > Some weeks ago, I have written something on reliable mapping, see > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Ulamm/Mappers,_evaluators_and_feedback > > For a special feature, I'd also added it to an existing article, but it > was reverted, see "Attention" in the upper table of > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:bicycle%3Duse_sidepath&oldid=1119074 > > Ulrich > > > Am 24.12.2014 um 01:29 schrieb [email protected]: > > Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 17:37:34 +0100 > From: Rainer Fügenstein <[email protected]> > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > <[email protected]> > Subject: [Tagging] Accuracy of survey > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > > while we are at it, imagine the following situation: > > mapper A, by means of DGPS, MilStd GPS, crystal ball etc., is able to > achieve an accuracy of, say, a few centimeters and uses it to add new > nodes (POIs) to OSM. > > some time later, mapper B with his/her ancestors mechanical GPS device > (*), achieving an accuracy of max., say, 15 meters, surveys the same > area, figures out that (by his/her point of view) POIs added by mapper > A are 15 meters off and corrects their location. > > what is needed here is some tag, saying "don't touch these > coordinates, they've been surveyed with high(est) accuracy". > > I heard this argument from an pipeline expert, noting that marker > surveyed with consumer GPS are (for their standards) way off their > real location. > > maybe this is a non-issue after all, if consensus is that consumer > GPS accuracy is sufficient enough. > > cu > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
