I support revert of ulamm's edit. 2015-01-01 22:09 GMT+01:00 715371 <[email protected]>:
> Hi, > > there is a sentence on > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway > > which says > > "It is also possible to use {{Tag|sidewalk|right}}/*=left [on > highway=cycleway] to indicate which side of the segregated path > pedestrians should walk on (where right/left is relative to the way's > direction)." > > It was originally contributed by ulamm and modified by RobJN after a > short discussion (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User_talk:RobJN). > But this is the opposite of what is written on > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks > > "The inclusion of sidewalk information makes it easier to provide > effective pedestrian routing, and in particular good narrative > descriptions of pedestrian routes along motorised roads. The sidewalk > tag is not needed on non-motorised thoroughfares, for example > highway=footway/cycleway/path/brideway/track. " > > I think there better solutions to the problem than ulamm's. > > If there are no further arguments, I will remove the sentence from the > first citation. What is your opinion on that? > > Cheers > Tobias > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
