Thanks for the suggestion. I think I got the answer. The unused land is the land scheduled for construction purpose. Is this suitable to use landuse = residential for such property??
Megha Shrestha Geomatics Engineer Intern Kathmandu Living Labs On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2015-01-02 10:25 GMT+01:00 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > >> Landuse=residential ? > > > > +1, but it wouldn't have connotations about the structure (one plot or > several plots or only part of a plot), only on the type of landuse. > > > >> Normally a village/town/city is marked this way. > > > > -1, villages, towns and cities are marked with place=village/town/city, > not with landuse. The key landuse is for the use of land. > > > Also how can you tag a private property which is unused? > > > it's hard to say what "unused" is intended to mean here, for residential > land with no residents, one might think that it is unused (as residential > land), but could still be used in different ways, e.g. as a meadow or > garden, to store stuff etc. For residential land with no constructions on > it, we typically use either landuse=green_field (land scheduled for > construction but no construction yet started) or brown_field (land with > former use, potentially contaminated, potentially old buildings on it). > Please note that the latter 2 tags don't fit well into the landuse scheme, > as they are also about scheduled constructions and legally possible > constructions, while the landuse key normally indicated the actual current > landuse for the land it is tagged on. > > cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
