I mentioned - "some really small airports have this codes". See - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/218821049 1048 m of grassy runway, has its own IATA code
2015-01-03 15:30 GMT+01:00 Janko Mihelić <[email protected]>: > I'm not an expert, but don't only big airports have the IATA code? Only 9 > airports have the IATA code in Croatia, and about 30 have the ICAO code. > Maybe you have to meet certain standards to get the IATA code. > > Janko Mihelić > > 2015-01-03 14:54 GMT+01:00 Christoph Hormann <[email protected]>: > >> On Saturday 03 January 2015, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: >> > - introducing new key that would allow to decide whatever >> > airport is important or not >> >> Independent from this particular problem manually tagging importance >> ratings is a really bad idea. Importance of a feature is nearly always >> a multi-criterion quantity. To make such a rating verifiable would >> require to have a recipe to calculate it from other observable facts - >> and then it is better to tag these facts rather than the combined >> rating calculated from them. >> >> As i have said on github the runway length would be a fairly good >> criterion for importance and it is very widely available already (35551 >> nodes aeroway=aerodrome with 31752 ways aeroway=runway). The problem >> here is not having this information mapped i think but querying it from >> the rendering database. >> >> -- >> Christoph Hormann >> http://www.imagico.de/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
