But we have also yet an existing tag water=pond for ponds. We would have to change the defination for this tag from “a pond” to “a pond – but not if this is a pond that serves for fishing” – sounds complicate … Lukas Sommer
2015-01-04 20:20 GMT+01:00 Janko Mihelić <[email protected]>: > 2015-01-04 19:55 GMT+01:00 Matthijs Melissen <[email protected]>: >> >> >> I would use a subtag, like natural=water, water=pond, pond=fish_pond. >> >> The paradoxic effect of adding more detailed tags is that the data >> gets less useful to data consumers, because most data users won't add >> particular processing rules for fish ponds, while if we use a subtag, >> they could still use the rules for water=pond. > > > But water=fishpond is already a subtag of natural=water. Most renderers (if > not all) use natural=water. I'm not sure if subtagging water=pond adds > anything useful to the equation. > > A pond is just a small lake, so that's a pretty vague tag to build upon. > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
