Oh, sorry, I see you mention it in the proposal. Still I don't see what would be bad about using "site" for the examples in your proposal, but I'll leave that there since you presumably feel differently.
Dan 2015-01-06 10:18 GMT+00:00 Dan S <danstowell+...@gmail.com>: > Hi - > > Does relation=site help? It sounds to me like a very similar concept: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Site > > Best > Dan > > 2015-01-06 10:36 GMT+00:00 Friedrich Volkmann <b...@volki.at>: >> I was going to write a proposal for relation type=cluster >> (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Cluster). Looking for >> real-world examples, I noticed that there's a relation type=group for the >> Great Lakes (id=1124369). >> >> What do you like better? type=group or type=cluster? >> >> -- >> Friedrich K. Volkmann http://www.volki.at/ >> Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging