I think that attraction=maze is better than attraction:type (shorter, without colon, "type" is not really adding anything useful, clear detailing of tourism=attraction).
2015-02-19 3:59 GMT+01:00 Bryce Nesbitt <[email protected]>: > If it's of interest to outsiders it seems like an attraction. Thus how > about: > > > *tourism=attraction* > *attraction:type=maze* > *name=Happy Tunnel Kiddie Maze* > *website=http://maze.example.org/ <http://maze.example.org/>* > > > You want all those similar features (maze/tube hill/ride/garden/water > park/whatever) to show up on a tourism/visitor type map. > This is also a clear case where the existing maze tags could be mass > retagged to the new scheme. > > ----------------------- > You just want to be clear if a given feature is PART of a larger > "attraction" (e.g. > one ride in a water park), or if it's the high level feature (e.g. the > water park itself). > See also http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dtheme_park > and the associated tagging. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
