He's trying to be helpful but has done a bad job of it. Sometimes too much information is a bad thing, especially if you don't present it in an understandable manner.
My vote is that it should be reverted. On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Martin Vonwald <[email protected]> wrote: > I asked the user for an explanation and revert: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User_talk:Pmailkeey003 > > If he doesn't react within a reasonable time, we should revert it anyway. > Opinions? > > Best regards, > Martin > > > 2015-02-23 10:37 GMT+01:00 Philip Barnes <[email protected]>: > >> I would also question the make it circular, roundabouts don't have to be >> circular. >> >> Phil (trigpoint ) >> >> On Mon Feb 23 07:43:36 2015 GMT, Martin Vonwald wrote: >> > Hi! >> > >> > Can someone please explain these edits to me: >> > >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag%3Ajunction%3Droundabout&diff=1142769&oldid=1107975 >> > >> > A little overkill - isn't it? And since when is area=no needed? >> > >> > Best regards, >> > Martin >> > >> >> -- >> Sent from my Jolla >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
