On 27.02.2015 13:05, Dave F. wrote: > What's the purpose of bridge=movable? > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge:movable > > It's good that the different types of bridge are tagged & the graphics > are excellent, but I'm unsure why they need to be separated to a sub tag.
For many applications, it makes sense to treat all movable bridges the same. Besides, not everyone is an expert on bridge types, but recognizing a bridge as movable is pretty easy. > If there is a genuine reason, then surely there should be the equivalent: > > bridge=static > bridge:static=* No, as there is no special treatment e.g. in routing for static bridges. Besides, with how many static vs. movable bridges there are, it's kind of the default. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
