Am 27.02.2015 um 22:44 schrieb Martin Vonwald: > 2015-02-27 16:22 GMT+01:00 fly <[email protected]>: > >> Did sleep one night and now think we should include bays and lanes >> within the lanes:-Tagging >> >> lanes=3 >> lanes:forward=2 >> lanes:backward=1 >> access:lanes:forward=yes|yes|emergency >> access:lanes:backward=yes|emergency >> > > To me it just does not feel right. I don't see a "lane" there...
Do you mean you see a difference between bay and lane or are both no lanes at all. >> All together I am not happy with the description of lanes=* and >> lanes:*=* anymore. Where is it useful as we already do not count bicycle >> lanes but do count exclusive bus or taxi lanes and even ones with access >> forbidden but wide enough for motorized vehicles. >> > > The key lanes and its subkeys are a misconception par excellence, no doubt > there. +1 >> Would prefer to change lanes=* and lanes:*=* to be the numbers with >> general access allowed and adding all additional lanes with access:lanes: >> > > I'm all in! Changing the meaning of a key that's used about 5 million times > might get a little tricky though. First, I need more information which software uses this tag atm and how it is used/spread across the globe. Not sure how far lanes:-tagging is spead so far either. Needs a separate thread. >> lanes=2 >> lanes:forward=1 >> lanes:backward=1 >> > > I wouldn't use lanes=2 in this example. 1+1=2 The wiki says to use lanes=* and at least one of lanes:backward/forward=*. I usually add all if not 1+1=2 where only lanes=2 is needed but as demonstration I tried to be exact as possible and rather include unnecessary tags. > access:lanes:forward=yes|no|no >> access:lanes:backward=yes|no >> bicycle:lanes:forward=yes|designated|no >> bicycle:lanes:backward=yes|yes >> bus:lanes:forward=yes|no|designated >> bus:lanes:backward=yes|designated >> taxi:lanes:backward=yes|yes >> > > That's an excellent example why the current access scheme sucks for this. > traffic_designation:lanes:forward=none|bicycle|bus Would work in this case. > traffic_designation:lanes:backward=none|bicycle;taxi traffic_designation:lanes:backward=none|bicycle;bus;taxi Not the same, see below. > Wouldn't that be A LOT easier? But not fit real world as we loose the different access tags per mode. Above example has a bus lane (blue sign) where taxi and bicycle is allowed (additional white sign "frei"). Cheers fly _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
