On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 2015-03-03 18:53 GMT+01:00 Bryce Nesbitt <[email protected]>: > >> Here's a draft of a wiki tag for this: >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:Mapping_Private_Property >> > > > This seems to be written with a certain cultural, legal and political > background. E.g. there are even people questioning the concept of private > property in general. Particularily this sentence might need > reconsideration: "Significant private objects such as building outlines or > swimming pools should be visible from a public place." > Agreed, there's a lot of cultural context in that statement. So far the OSM project seems to be OK that "from the air" is a public place, and things visible are fair to map. All the same: please don't map my rubbish bin, or my backyard trampoline, even though both can be picked on an air photo. -- What if anything should we do about the toilets inside people's houses that are mapped amenity=toilets? What guideline works to distinguish mappabliltiy of fully personal, club, paid, permissive and fully public objects?
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
