+1 leaf_type=palm would loose no data, and still be recognizable as a broadleaved leaf type.
It certainly seems to me that palm trees are different enough from what I usually consider to be a broad-leafed tree to warrant their own leaf_type. My 2 cents On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Bryce Nesbitt <bry...@obviously.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Lukas Sommer <sommer...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> So it this seems to me that this is just a special case of broadleaved. >> > > The difficulty is that palms are widely mapped now, and changing type=palm > to leaf_type=broadleaved > feels like removing information. Yet that's what the wiki recommends > doing. > > However, leaf_type=palm would loose no data, and still be recognizable as > a broadleaved leaf type. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
