It would be harder to process and break existing data consumers. I think that cascading tagging style - [leaf_type=broadleaved; broadleaved=palm] would be better.
It provides full information without growing list of valid values of leaf_type. 2015-03-11 2:32 GMT+01:00 Bryce Nesbitt <bry...@obviously.com>: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Lukas Sommer <sommer...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> So it this seems to me that this is just a special case of broadleaved. >> > > The difficulty is that palms are widely mapped now, and changing type=palm > to leaf_type=broadleaved > feels like removing information. Yet that's what the wiki recommends > doing. > > However, leaf_type=palm would loose no data, and still be recognizable as > a broadleaved leaf type. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
