On mercredi 11 mars 2015, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > in some cases it's modernizing tagging
I don't like the sound of "Modernizing tagging in a mechanical way", that should be handeled with care, and time. If you intend to replace all type=deciduous to leaf_cycle=deciduous send a new email with a new title so that people know what you'r up to. But I'still against integrating that change to a well understood "mechanical revert of a previous mechanical edit" > To be clear: > Initial post to the mailing list involved: *removing useless fixmes* > Based on list feedback, the discussion shifted and was focused on one task: > * remove denotation=cluster along with the fixme* (the fixme was in fact > recognized as flag for the bad data). I'm still okay with that. As long as it means removing denotation=cluster as it was automatically added with the fixme=set␣better␣denotation. But not manually entered denotation=cluster like : http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2919343692/history If you wish to, please send another email with title : "removing all denotation=cluster tags on natural=tree" > On the table now: * performing remaining needed cleanup on objects that > will be edited anyway* And I'm not okay with that unless discussed on a separated topic -- sly, direct contact : [email protected] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Sletuffe _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
