The problem with frequency=XXX.XXX MHz is that many people known only the channels (e.g "9"). And it's not just frequency, it's encoding (GMRS/CB/etc)
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Sam Dyck <samueld...@gmail.com> wrote: > >Could the road be given property tags; > >tag haul_road=yes > >frequency= as per http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:frequency > > > >? > > > >or a single property tag; > >frequency:haul_road= then use the same value system as key:frequency? > >That may make the meaning clear? As duplexing is not used you don't need > >to stipulate it. > > Haul channel is just the term I've heard used, the "channel 9" I reference > on the wiki is used on an actual road where it refers to 154.635 MHz. I'm > not sure about the term haul_road. Given the ambiguity of the term (Isn't > every road with truck traffic a haul road?) would it make more sense to > just use frequency=XXX.XXX MHz on any road where applicable? This would > eleminate the need for new tags. > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
