Proposal: let's change it to "8 unanimous approval votes or 10 or more votes with at least 74 % approval ones"?
I agree that the current situation looks funny pretty often. On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 6:46 PM, Bryce Nesbitt <bry...@obviously.com> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Friedrich Volkmann <b...@volki.at> wrote: >> >> As you are already indicating, 15 is too low a quorum in that case. We >> cannot considering 8:7 votes an approval when we cosider 8:1 votes an >> approval. That would mean that more negative votes would turn a rejection >> to >> an approval, which is absurd. > > > Exactly that happened. There was a proposal with 7 votes, some positive > some negative. > 3 more people voted no, flipping it to approval. > > > If the purpose of the wiki procedure is to find consensus, a bare 50% > majority indicates > a near complete failure. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
