On 15/03/2015 4:50 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 5:37 AM, Andreas Goss <andi...@t-online.de
<mailto:andi...@t-online.de>> wrote:
Either use a site relation
Then why isn't this in the proposal?
I never envisaged a reception desk that would be off the site. Or place
in such a way that it could not be seen to be part of a site.
What is the ratio of having to use a 'site relation' occuring to the
simple case ? Less than 10%.. ?
I'll add a link to site relation ... there are other links that could be
added too.. like urls, phone numbers, opening hours, checked etc etc ..
the possibilities of things that could be used are large. I've only
included those that I thought to be common, not rare.
I think the negative votes followed from a poorly formatted and
confusing proposal.
Thanks for the negativity. Very helpfull.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
