Regarding the power=minor_line tag vs distribution : This problem is currently discussed in the Power path refinement proposal http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Power_transmission_refinement and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Power_paths_refinement
Link to Talk : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Power_paths_refinement#line.3D.2A_and_cable.3D.2A:_similarity_and_difference power=line + usage=distribution or power=line + usage=transmission sounds better than line / minor_line. +1 with Bryce to say transmission/distribution (IEC 601-01-09 <http://www.electropedia.org/iev/iev.nsf/display?openform&ievref=601-01-09> and 601-01-10 <http://www.electropedia.org/iev/iev.nsf/display?openform&ievref=601-01-10>) is far better than minor/major but the proposal hasn't been voted yet. Feel free to complete it according to your needs. All the best <http://www.electropedia.org/iev/iev.nsf/display?openform&ievref=601-01-09> *François Lacombe* fl dot infosreseaux At gmail dot com www.infos-reseaux.com @InfosReseaux <http://www.twitter.com/InfosReseaux> 2015-03-15 18:04 GMT+01:00 Bryce Nesbitt <[email protected]>: > On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Kytömaa Lauri <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> power=minor_line renders already and describes these better. Physically >> smaller things than those thicker wires on big towers with long spans and >> high voltage. > > > "minor" requires a judgement call. "distribution" is a cleaner dividing > line. > -- > What's not clean is having a street map cluttered up with distribution > power lines. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
