Hi Jan, Your rule would mean that with 7/3 would be a rejection while 8/7 an approval. I suggest to not only bring the logic back but also address this issue.
I agree that it changes the rules, but why not try to improve them? Cheers, Kotya On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Jan van Bekkum <[email protected]> wrote: > I would like to stick to my original proposal. It brings the logic back, > but doesn't change the rules. > > > *"enough support" is 8 approval votes on a total of 14 votes or less and a > majority approval otherwise.* > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:07 PM Martin Koppenhoefer < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> Am 17.03.2015 um 15:04 schrieb Kotya Karapetyan <[email protected]>: >> >> I don't think there is a procedure to vote on such proposals, so please >> just give it +1 here if you agree. We change it when we have 8+ "plus ones" >> if there are no significant objections to *this* change. >> >> Once again, please note: we are not discussing the consequences of >> approval/rejection, we just change the rule of thumb recommendation to a >> mathematically more sound one. >> >> >> >> I also don't think there is a procedure to change the proposal voting >> system and how votes are counted. 8 votes in favor of a change seem too >> few, and besides this, IMHO this is not something we should vote on the >> tagging mailing list, I suggest to announce it more broadly, eg on the >> national lists and on talk. >> >> cheers >> Martin >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
