This sounds like it would be connected to the "man_made=bridge" proposals to map bridges as polygons. Maybe representing the parapets as lines that share nodes with part of the "man_made=bridge" polygon?
-- Chris Hoess On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Dudley Ibbett <[email protected]> wrote: > It would appear that the rendering for a bridge might include the > parapet. Much of my local mapping however includes barriers along roads. > These are generally connected to the bridge parapet. It would seem > reasonable to therefore have a seperate way for each bridge paparet that > links the barriers either side of the bridge. Perhaps, barrier=wall, > wall=parapet. Parapet is however used in more that one context > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parapet If bridge parapets were to be > mapped would they therefore need a more distinct name in this context > "bridge_parapet" of should there be some sort of relation between the > highway segment of the bridge and its associated parapets? > > At the moment I just leave the barriers "hanging" but it doesn't seem like > a very satisfactory approach to mapping given they are attached to the > bridge. > > Regards > > Dudley > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
