Dear all, We have enough support to change the current math and no dramatic opposition. I will do it in the wiki now. If you feel I haven't taken something critically important into account and this change is for the worse, not better, please roll back.
The discussions on the more global change of the proposal/voting process and on how to carry out discussions goes on :) Cheers, Kotya On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Tobias Knerr <[email protected]> wrote: > On 17.03.2015 15:04, Kotya Karapetyan wrote: > > I propose to clarify it by changing the recommended number of votes > > in > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features#Approved_or_rejected > > from ".../8 unanimous approval votes/ /or //15 total votes with a > > majority approval.../" > > to "/...8 or more //unanimous approval votes or 10 or more total votes > > with more than 74 % approval...//"./ > > This will not change anything in terms of the ongoing discussion of > > /how/ the approval influences other things. So the discussion can > > continue. But we'd introduce some mathematical logic in the process. > > +1 > > I think it's not ideal that this would make it easier to accept > proposals with very few voters (e.g. a 8:2 majority), so I would prefer > a higher quorum (e.g. 15). But in my opinion it's still acceptable, and > better than no change. > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
