start_date is more universal like using it for shops and amenities and not only for buildings is possible.
You can use start_date with construction=*, too, it only vanishes after the construction is finished. Have no problem with construction:start_date=* but please use comprehensive and clear tags. Why not invent some more tags for constructions like buildings=* if useful. cu fly Am 23.03.2015 um 23:15 schrieb Warin: > start_date ? start of planning?, construction? occupation? > > completion of planning? construction? occupation? > > built_data ... is fairly simple. I like simple and plain. It would need > more words for structures that have several 'additions', > 'refurbishments', etc .. but the meaning is more apparent than > start_date and completion_date. > > On 24/03/2015 8:43 AM, John F. Eldredge wrote: >> Wouldn't it make much more sense to use start_date for the starting >> date, and completion_date for the completion date? _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging