On Fri, 2015-03-27 at 09:58 +0100, Marc Gemis wrote: > "It is not necessary or appropriate to use a relation when all the > elements contained within the boundary of the site belong to the site, > and no elements beyond that boundary do belong. In this simple case > simply tag the perimeter with all the appropriate tags. Users of the > information can simply perform an 'is-in-polygon' test to determine > which elements belong to the site." [1]
OK, I did not know that ! Is this "is-in-polygon" test something that is already being done ? Examples ? It does mean that a camp_site needs to be mapped as a polygon, not a node but thats not too bad. David > > > > > regards > > > > > m > > > [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:site > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 9:52 AM, David Bannon > <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 2015-03-27 at 07:31 +0000, Jan van Bekkum wrote: > > > Separate nodes for campground and amenities > connected in a site relation > > Only practical solution IHMO. > > David > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
