“Supported” by whom? To me that implies that a number of data consumers/renders will use that data.
I personally interpret a voted on wiki proposal as “recommended”. Tod > On Apr 3, 2015, at 7:49 AM, Jan van Bekkum <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is "supported" reasonable? > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 4:41 PM Tobias Knerr <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > On 03.04.2015 11:22, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > > The proposal on the table is to change the wiki status of "Approved" to > > read "Published" > > I would prefer to stay with "approved". Using "published" would not > actually make things clearer, quite the opposite: Using the normal > meaning of "published", a proposal is published as soon as someone hits > the save button. > > > The feeling is the term "published" is less > > likely to cause new mappers to incorrectly weight the tagging > > conventions described on the wiki. > > Placing more weight on tags that are the result of public discussion and > represent a consensus among interested mappers is actually a good thing. > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging> > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
