> On Apr 7, 2015, at 6:56 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > 2015-04-03 11:08 GMT+02:00 Bryce Nesbitt <[email protected]>: >>> At most they will be access=permissive. Public implies an inalienable right >>> of access supported by law. >>> >> Permissive implies something far different to me. It means that I can walk >> onto the property without prior arrangement, and chances are nobody will >> hassle me. > > > +1 > a camp could be "access=permissive" (trespassing tolerated) or > access="private" / access=customers where private and customers seem similar. > access=yes /public (a right for everyone to access) is not a situation I have > ever encountered on a camp site, but it might eventually exist. >
Any camp that doesn't allow any access, even hikers/bikers without paying a fee is access=customers, right? Even if it is a "public" park? if you can access the camp without a car (like a lot of state parks) for just daytime access for free and then fee=yes on the parking... And some camping:fee= or something to show that camping there is for a fee, but independent of actual access to the grounds? A lot of govt operated campgrounds Do feel like access=public, as you can show up there and expect access during business hours of the camp (like a library) - but *using the camping specific amenities* requires a permit/fee - but is still open to the general public (like a public park or public parking, which are also subject to regulation & fees, now that I think about it, like parking meters and time limits). Permissive would have to be on any privately owned camps that open to the general public right? Or am I misunderstanding the access=key? Javbw.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
