Am 07.04.2015 um 18:39 schrieb Dave F.: > Hi > > I thought it was required for platform as some were being drawn as a > single line & as OSM has no specific closed polygon entity, renderers > can't tell if it's an area to be filled or an extremely squiggly platform.
No problem with platform as way (line) but as closed way, really. Wonder about platform building a "ring" but no area. All the the ones I know at least have different ref=* and therefore need to be splitted. Could you show us a real world example, please ? > Ah, I forgot about aeroways. I'm surprised the conclusion was the width > tag. With locations that have aerial imagery it's much more accurate to > trace its width. Couldn't the renderers adapt to both? If it has area > then fill it, if it has width render it as such. Same problem as highway=*, you never know if a closed way tagged with aeroway=taxiway is an area or a loop. As far as I can judge a clean separation would be the best: for highway and aeroway representing the area as area:highway=* respectively area:aeroway=* and only tag ways with highway and aeroway. Cheers fly _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
