On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected] > wrote:
> > if thats the only thing you're interested in you can also tag > ref=42 > highway=unclassified > (on a node) > ;-) > gives you even a bold font... The fact that rendering on osm-carto is so far behind tagging *is* an issue. But here I'm more concerned about routing than rendering. What syntax makes the most sense for routing all the way to a pitch? addr:housenumber is pretty clearly wrong. But treating the campsite like a building, and the pitches like apartments, makes a lot of logical sense. And it scales well to how much is known: 0) leisure=camp_site, drinking_water=no (nothing is known about pitches) 1) capacity=100 (we know there are 100 pitches, but not where they are) 2) addr:unit=1-50 addr:interpolation=all (we know pitches 1-50 along this road or area, but not exactly where) 3) addr:interpolation=odd addr:unit=1-49 (tagging one side of a road) 4) addr:unit=1 (here's the center or entrance of pitch #1). 5) relation=site addr:unit=1 contains bench/parking/sewer dump/picnic table/gopher hole/tree/blades of grass (micro mapping extraordinaire)
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
