2015-04-26 18:58 GMT+02:00 fly <[email protected]>:

> I would go with a relation or even landcover=* and not natural=wood at
> all together with coastline.
>


+1, I would make a multipolygon relation with the coastline way(s) as outer
member(s), and add natural=wood (if applicable) and landcover=trees to the
relation.

Cheers,
Martin
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to